Age Restriction Pulled for G'town Housing -- '77 Court Ruling Keeps City From Limit in Retiree Households
The Commercial Appeal (2007-Current) › October 05, 2007
Linked as:
The Commercial Appeal (2007-Current) › October 05, 2007
Linked as:Summary
Because a grandmother in Ohio was sentenced to jail and fined more than 30 years ago for allowing a grandson to live with her, Germantown can't enforce an age restriction on retirement housing in the city.
The grandmother's case went to the U.S. Supreme Court, which in 1977 decided that East Cleveland, Ohio, couldn't use its housing ordinance to dictate which members of a family could live together.See the full content of this document
Extract
Age Restriction Pulled for G'town Housing -- '77 Court Ruling Keeps City From Limit in Retiree Households
In Germantown, that court ruling means that the city could not prevent someone younger th...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Southern Pacific Company Appellant v W H Wilson Appellee. 378 F.2d 533 5th Cir 1967 | agency information collection activities: proposed collection; comment request, | ports and waterways safety: buzzards bay, ma; sunken fishing vessel cape fear; safety zone, | banks and bank holding companies: meetings; sunshine act, | Sentencia nº 3735 de Consiglio di Stato July 16 2008 | sentencia nº 2686 de consiglio di stato, june 22, 2011 | sentencia nº 6045 de consiglio di stato, december 03, 2009 | Decisión de Tribunal Tercero de Primera Instancia en Funciones de Juicio de Lara Extensión Barquisimeto de January 18 2012